Subproject C5

Variable processes and application of methods and technologies for uncertainty control in load-carrying systems

To enhance the predictive capability of mathematical models, data uncertainty as well as model uncertainty have to be considered. The focus of subproject C5 is the investigation of model uncertainty. The goal is to make a contribution to the description, quantification and assessment of model uncertainty inherent to mathematical models.

Quantification of Model Uncertainty

Figure2.: Demonstrator of the CRC 805
Figure2.: Demonstrator of the CRC 805

Mathematical models for the description of the input-output relation are omnipresent in mechanical engineering. They are used for the design, analysis and optimization of technical systems and provide support in the decision-making during the product development process. Moreover, models utilized in the early stages of the product development process are often characterized by incomplete or missing information about the system to be described. Thus, simplifications and assumptions play a central role during the modeling process. Therefore, the description of the functional relationship is incomplete, unknown or remains unregarded – model uncertainty inheres in the model. Disregarding the model uncertainty during parameter calibration of the model can deteriorate the predictive capabilities of the calibrated model. The overall goal of our research is to ensure the predictive capability of the model under presence of model uncertainty.

Figure2.: Confidence intervals for the discrepancy function for two different models
Figure2.: Confidence intervals for the discrepancy function for two different models

The subproject C5 of the CRC 805 focus on the question, how model uncertainty can be accounted for in a statistical parameter calibration by modeling the model discrepancy. One approach in considering the model discrepancy consists in a so-called discrepancy function that is statistically calibrated alongside the model. The discrepancy function can be modeled using a Gaussian process that constitutes a generalization of the normal distribution in the function space. At the example of the demonstrator of the CRC (fig. 1) it has been investigated, how the discrepancy function of different models can be used for an assessment of model uncertainty. The representation of the discrepancy function as a Gaussian process allows for the specification of quantiles that can be used to compare the model uncertainty inherent to the models (fig. 2). This allows for an assessment of the model uncertainty and a model selection.

Video: Drop test of modular active spring-damper system MAFDS

Recommended external content

We have selected external content from YouTube for you and would like to show it to you right here. To do this, you must reveal it with one click. You can hide the external content at any time with another click.

I agree to external content from YouTube being shown to me. This may result in personal data being transmitted to third-party platforms. You can find more information in our Privacy Policy.

[1] Platz, Roland; Ondoua, Serge; Enss, Georg C.; Melz, Tobias (2014): Approach to Evaluate Uncertainty in Passive and Active Vibration Reduction. In: S. Atamturktur, B. Moaveni, C. Papadimitriou und T. Schoenherr (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 32nd IMAC, S. 345–352. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[2] Platz, Roland; Enss, Georg C. (2015): Comparison of Uncertainty in Passive and Active Vibration Isolation. In: S. Atamturktur, B. Moaveni, C. Papadimitriou und T. Schoenherr (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 33rd IMAC, S. 15–25. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[3] Melzer, Christiane M.; Krech, Martin; Kristl, Lisa; Freund, Tilmann; Kuttich, Anja; Zocholl, Maximilian et al. (2015): Methodical Approaches to Describe and Evaluate Uncertainty in the Transmission Behavior of a Sensory Rod. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publications 807, S. 205–217.

[4] Melzer, Christiane M.; Platz, Roland; Melz, Tobias (2015): Comparison of Methodical Approaches to Describe and Evaluate Uncertainty in the Load-Bearing Capacity of a Truss Structure. In: Y. Tsompanakis, J. Kruis und B.H.V. Topping (Hg.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Soft Computing Technology in Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering. Prague, Czech Republic.

[5] Melzer, Christiane M.; Platz, Roland; Melz, Tobias (2015): Consistent Comparison of Methodical Approaches to Describe and Evaluate Uncertainty in the Load-Carrying Capacity of a Truss Structure. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Structural Engineering Dynamics ICEDyn. Lagos, Portugal.

[6] Platz, Roland; Götz, Benedict; Melz, Tobias (2016): Approach to evaluate and to compare basic structural design concepts of landing gears in early stage of development under uncertainty. In: S. Atamturktur, B. Moaveni, C. Papadimitriou und T. Schoenherr (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 34th IMAC, S. 167–175. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[7] Platz, Roland; Melzer, Christiane M. (2016): Uncertainty quantification for decision making in early design phase for passive and active vibration isolation. In: Proceedings of ISMA 2016 including USD 2016 International Conference on Uncertainty in Structural Dynamics. ISMA Advance Conference Programme, S. 4501–4513. Leuven, Belgium.

[8] Mallapur, Shashidhar; Platz, Roland (2017): Quantification and Evaluation of Uncertainty in the Mathematical Modelling of a Suspension Strut Using Bayesian Model Validation Approach, In: R. Barthorpe, R. Platz, R. Lopez I., B. Moaveni and C. Papadimitriou (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 35th IMAC, S. 113–124. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[9] Platz, Roland; Götz, Benedict (2017): Non-probabilistic Uncertainty Evaluation in the Concept Phase for Airplane Landing Gear Design, In: R. Barthorpe, R. Platz, R. Lopez I., B. Moaveni and C. Papadimitriou (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 35th IMAC, S. 161-169. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[10] Mallapur, Shashidhar; Platz, Roland (2017): Bayesian Inference Approach to Evaluate the Uncertainty in the Mathematical Modelling of a Suspension Strut, In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Engineering Dynamics ICEDyn, Ericeira, Portugal.

[11] Li, Sushan; Götz, Benedict; Schäffner, Maximilian; Platz, Roland (2017): Approach to prove the Efficiency of the Monte Carlo Method combined with the Elementary Effect Method to quantify Uncertainty of a Beam Structure with piezo-elastic Supports, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Sciences and Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece.

[12] Li, Sushan; Platz, Roland (2017): Observations by Evaluating the Uncertainty of Stress Distribution in Truss Structures Based on Probabilistic and Possibilistic Methods, Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, 2, 3, 2017, S. 031006.

[13] Li, Sushan; Slomsik, Elena; Melz, Tobias (2017): Numerical uncertainty analysis of active and passive structures in the structural design phase, Procedia Engineering, 199, 2017, S. 1240-1245.

[14] Kohler, Michael; Krzyzak, Adam; Mallapur, Shashidhar; Platz, Roland (2018): Uncertainty Quantification in Case of Imperfect Models: A Non-Bayesian Approach, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 35, 2018, S. 1874.

[15] Mallapur, Shashidhar; Platz, Roland (2018): Quantification of Uncertainty in the Mathematical Modelling of a Multivariable Suspension Strut Using Bayesian Interval Hypothesis-Based Approach, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 118, 2018, S. 3-17.

[16] Mallapur, Shashidhar; Platz, Roland (2019): Uncertainty Quantification in the Mathematical Modelling of a Suspension Strut using Bayesian Inference, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 118, 2019, S. 158–170.

[17] Feldmann, Robert; Platz, Roland (2019): Assessing Model Form Uncertainty for a Suspension Strut using Gaussian Processes, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Sciences and Engineering, Crete, Greece.

[18] Locke, Robert; Kupis, Shyla; Gehb, Christopher M.; Platz, Roland; Atamturktur, Sez (2019): Applying Uncertainty Quantification to Structural Systems: Parameter Reduction for Evaluating Model Complexity, In: R. Barthorpe, R. Platz, R. Lopez I., B. Moaveni and C. Papadimitriou (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 37th IMAC, S. 241-256. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[19] Lenz, Jonathan; Platz, Roland (2019): Quantification and Evaluation of Parameter and Model Uncertainty for Passive and Active Vibration Isolation, In: R. Barthorpe, R. Platz, R. Lopez I., B. Moaveni and C. Papadimitriou (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 37th IMAC, S. 135-147. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[20] Feldmann, Robert; Gehb, Christopher M.; Schaeffner, Maximilian; Melz, Tobias (2020): Recursive Gaussian Processes for Discrepancy Modeling, ISMA 2020 – Proceedings of ISMA2020 including USD2020 International Conference on Uncertainty in Structural Dynamics, Leuven, Belgium.

[21] Feldmann, Robert; Gehb, Christopher M.; Schäffner, Maximilian; Matei, Alexander; Lenz, Jonathan; Kersting, Sebastian; Weber Moritz (2020): A Detailed Assessment of Model Form Uncertainty in a Load-Carrying Truss Structure. In: M. Zhu (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 38th IMAC, S. 303-314. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

[22] Feldmann, Robert; Schäffner, Maximilian; Gehb, Christopher M.; Platz, Roland; Melz, Tobias (2020): Analyzing Propagation of Model Form Uncertainty for Different Suspension Strut Models. In: M. Zhu (Hg.): Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the 38th IMAC, S. 255-263. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Subproject Managers

Photo Name Contact
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Tobias Melz
Dr.-Ing. Roland Platz